Note 28

Here we have an explicit proposition about the attribution of the (accidental) form  sad  (indicating this attribution by equating the predicate term  ' sad '  with the subject term  ' Cassio ' ),  which proposition is a member of the set of all possible implicit predications predicating the term  ' sad '  of some possible subject term, which together constitute or develops the concept  ' sad '  (to the members of this set also belongs the predication of the term  ' sad '  of  the (most general) subject term  ' this ',  but for full characterization and constitution of the concept  ' sad '  all its possible subjects must enter into that characterization].

Back to main text