The often extensive integration [as is seen] in processes of regeneration (and the same may be said about transformation) may speak in favor of Unimol. A system -- one at least would assume -- could, from what still is present, leave to "remain" much more and use [because in a system we have to our disposal (i.e. to the regeneration's disposal) separate individual parts and particles. And this fact diminishes true integration.]. The question of the unchangeableness, of the stability in spite of metabolism, and the fact of the unerring detection of the right place, also is unequivocally solved by Unimol as the "overall plan" governing life.
In whatever way one wants, in relevant cases, to apply the "impact theory", and whatever variations from the ideal form may appear, the one-quantum all-or-nothing, [and thus] the fact that one single quantum may kill a relative giant organism, is especially clear from Unimol, because then a quantum and an organism have, so to say (namely individual-essentially seen), the "same" order of magnitude, which isn't compatible at all (and thus also not "quasi-") with the pure system view.
The, related with it, questions of directioning things [in organisms], posed by P. Jordan with his theory of amplification -- (one-quantum- or few-quanta-amount of energy is taken up by very sensitive sites in the organism, and act, according to the principle of amplification (the physical analogue would be the working of the relais), by triggering, on the stocked potential energies, or, by catalytically mobilizing, [act] on the stocked chemical energies, etc., so that immediately, or at least in linear sequence, substantial macrophysical effects take place) -- have, for our own considerations, for the time being only a mere secondary significance, although the mechanism [of amplification], as complete functional system, may well be supported by Unimol [A small stimulus may be conducted through, and at the same time amplified by, the mega-molecule].