The correlation between ESF and stability may suggest not to attribute a complete ESF to short-living and normally conditionally unstable [free-living] elementary particles (the few "real" as well as the many enforced situational particles [virtual particles] ), but only attribute it [a complete ESF] to the systematically constituted (divisible) forms, beginning with the atom. On the other hand, if one considers the fact that probably every existing thing [every being whatsoever] is ESF-al, then one may also formally attribute an ESF equivalent to the ultimate particles. Or, what -- at least practically formally -- is still better : They possess an incomplete partial ESF, whose incompleteness and "aspiration" to completion appear as the special features of the elementary particles. If now also the ultimate elementary particles possess at least some sort of "ESF", then it may already lie in their nature that there is possible a certain freedom of interactional "acting", not only externally-conditionally but also constitutively-"causally", or at least that it appears so to us. The for every existent individual particle assumed individual ESF, with also here only functional identity, renders indeterminism already possible.
A formula, erected for this ESF of particles, should reveal this possibility. We do not know how difficult it is to set up such a formula. It must of course be about revealing "readable" formulae, not merely symbolic ones.
Atoms (including hydrogen) do undoubtedly already possess wholeness nature, and in the atomic nucleus the elements [constituents] are coalesced and not additional, precisely as the individual atoms in molecules. For the hydrogen atom there is no simple model consisting of "free" nucleus and "free" electron, held together by electrostatic attraction. It is a connection [of intra-atomic constituents] under the influence of conditions which formally and in a certain sense even really correspond to the molecular bonding conditions.